3 ms·
But that surely is the description of 1% of the drivers. It should be better than the 1% worst drivers. It should be demonstrably safer than humans on average w
by carlmr 5y ago
But that surely is the description of 1% of the drivers. It should be better than the 1% worst drivers. It should be demonstrably safer than humans on average with a good margin.
- minhazm 5y agoEven if they accomplish that, people will move the goal posts. People are illogical and will see some edge case that self driving might perform worse at, but on an aggregate data basis it might be 10x safer than human drivers. People will see that 1 edge case and say that self driving cars are worse than humans.
- mikestew 5y agoThat's an awful lot of presumption of "people"'s behavior toward a system that has failed nearly every promise made. There's no need to move the goal posts when the player isn't anywhere near it. I mean, if we're going to talk about someone moving goal posts around, how about the one claiming "full self-driving" for a system that isn't anything of the sort?