> Science is the only field where ML would truly shine and be really useful. It's clear to see how ML is useful for science, but why exactly do you think it's

> Science is the only field where ML would truly shine and be really useful. It's clear to see how ML is useful for science, but why exactly do you think it's *only* useful for science? It seems like in order for that to be true, you'd have to expand the definition of science to basically everything.