3 ms·
Here is how you could be more persuasive: use your expertise to explain why modern psychological science has moved on from Freud, how it's different from pop ps
by dash2 5y ago
Here is how you could be more persuasive: use your expertise to explain why modern psychological science has moved on from Freud, how it's different from pop psychology, and to give some examples of solid, reproducible, insightful work in the field.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- SubiculumCode 5y agoGoodbye Sigmund Freud: The case for exorcising the ghost of Freud from the field of psychology https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2019.1673869?casa_token=sby3TrdHOgcAAAAA%3A4gwzKGbeujXNyGTi1IdK3PRfBvGBcZyfPEBfpsxIZAME2MpterOtvskYQhfFIGtSEFKdpFLb50bCXg https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2019.1...
- leucineleprec0n 5y agoNice, thanks for this, I've no papers on the matter of course but this was always my issue with his drivel on an instinctive level before I was able to elucidate it - namely the lack of even vague attempts at grounding his Uber-mystic theories with empirical foundations, tests. What may be more amazing is that scrolling through these threads treating K*hneman or others seriously. Invariably if cognitive psych or physiology make the rounds here I feel a serious case of guilty Gell-Mann Amnesia. I mean, is it too much to ask the constituents of this forum to keep the pace ahead of "Ah, Thinking Fast and Slow was really intellectually stimulating" in 2021, or... ever?.