3 ms·
While I understand the sentiment this type of filter would make people's lives with a disability worse in the real. Better to accept ones self then cover defini
by barcoder 5y ago
While I understand the sentiment this type of filter would make people's lives with a disability worse in the real. Better to accept ones self then cover defining features with a filter
- justinjlynn 5y agoYou know what: no. The only person who gets to decide what's best for helping a person cope with their differing needs is that person with differing needs.
- nxpnsv 5y agoBut what if it solves the problem of barcoder not understanding stuttering? I mostly agree with you, but in principle subtitles and voice over does the same thing - not everything is so simple.
- justinjlynn 5y agoPeople being left to make their own decisions about using or foregoing prosthetic technologies sounds rather simple to me.
- TeMPOraL 5y agoIt's a can of worms. The trouble starts when the problem is solvable and/or doesn't pass to the next generation, and yet some parents insist their children not to be treated, or even to be inflicted with the problem, in order to keep them within the community of other people dealing with that problem.
- justinjlynn 5y agoI am thinking of the children; especially so - of their right to choose.
- nxpnsv 5y agoAs a filter that can be enabled in a video player UI, it would act very much like subtitles or voice over - here it is an aid to the consumer and everybody makes their own decision. As a mandated thing for all stuttering content it's limiting freedom of expression and is bad. My point is that it is not black or white, and it depends how something is deployed.
- adenozine 5y agoThen we can accept there's not an ML solution for it, since sufferers haven't built it yet.
- marliechiller 5y agoobjectively this is false.
- ranguna 5y agoIf that was the case, we wouldn't need psychologists, would we ?