4 ms·
To be clear, the computers already were taking pictures. This was to draw attention to that fact. Perhaps the computers for public use should not take photos?
by zeckalpha 5y ago
To be clear, the computers already were taking pictures. This was to draw attention to that fact. Perhaps the computers for public use should not take photos?
- Rebelgecko 5y ago>To be clear, the computers already were taking pictures How so?
- judge2020 5y ago> This was to draw attention to that fact. Nowhere in the post do I have an indication this is trying to say "wake up Apple customers! Their imacs are taking pictures of you while you're in the store!". It's not as if people aren't already recorded 24/7 by security cameras in retail stores.
- monkeydreams 5y agoAnd nowhere in Picasso's painting did he harangue his audience about how he was trying to reduce representational imagery down to its core and elemental features. Art works best by allowing people to discover their narrative through the piece.
- shkkmo 5y agoNo, McDonald wrote a timelapse program that took pictures, detected faces, and uploaded them to his server. > I started working on a modified version of the timelapse application. Instead of saving to disk, it sent images to my server. And it only saved photos containing a face.
- jabedude 5y agoWhere is proof of the computers "already taking pictures"?