> and even "fathers" of the theory understood that and acknowledge the need for regulation when its absent. I would emphasize that traditional forms of conserv

> and even "fathers" of the theory understood that and acknowledge the need for regulation when its absent. I would emphasize that traditional forms of conservatism were never opposed to all regulation and never embraced this libertarian worship of the unregulated market. They were opposed to collectivism, but the only remaining option isn't radical individualism. Neither are good for the individual or for society.