3 ms·
i guess it is a recent development as i don't remember seeing that from AMZN recruiters before and thus those current employees may not experienced it when they
by trhway 5y ago
i guess it is a recent development as i don't remember seeing that from AMZN recruiters before and thus those current employees may not experienced it when they were recruited.
I think it is an outrageous borderline illegal practice worth mentioning in related public forums, as I think it may become a widely accepted practice if not called.
If you think about it - i posted about multi-trillion dollar company with an army of lawyers what probably [IANAL] can be construed as libel if not true. Would i be posting it if i didn't have documentary support for it? ( AMZN has it on their email servers too so it isn't out if the blue for them)
- WaitWaitWha 5y agoI am calling this horse pucky. I am going to throw my anecdotal feedback to counter your anecdote. I checked with amzn recruiter friends and they were all going "wha?"... Their current biggest problem is "getting someone who is 50% better then the hiring team". Cutting people with extensive experience would be counterproductive to this goal.
- pc86 5y agoSo you don't have any corroborating evidence, any sources, anything other than your word? You might as well be making it up. "Well I'd get in trouble if I'm wrong" isn't a good defense, especially on a pseudonymous forum where people post wrong information constantly. I think the odds of AMZN trawling through your comments to try and figure out who you are just to pursue libel charges are as close to zero as anything could be.