> I don't think scihub is the future. OpenAccess is the future. It seems you are claiming that the future isn't making all scientific content available, period

> I don't think scihub is the future. OpenAccess is the future. It seems you are claiming that the future isn't making all scientific content available, period - but rather only that content whose copyright holders have decided to make available. I whole-heartedly disagree. We must not submit to arbitrary restrictions on the copying of information; and we certainly cannot and should not wait for Elsevier, Springer, IEEE et alia to grace us with access to articles. Also - if "Open Access" means authors have to pay a large wad of money to have their papers published - that's not tolerable either.