3 ms·
Both those sources are the same paper, fyi. Found a PDF here: http://www.soliftec.com/NonExhaust%20PMs.pdf http://www.soliftec.com/NonExhaust%20PMs.pdf And the
by sdflhasjd 5y ago
Both those sources are the same paper, fyi. Found a PDF here: http://www.soliftec.com/NonExhaust%20PMs.pdf http://www.soliftec.com/NonExhaust%20PMs.pdf
And the claim is a bit dubious, imo. It looks like they're counting "resuspension" (kicking up existing settled PM2.5 in the wake) as a source.
- briefcomment 5y agoThe first link cites multiple papers, including the one in the second link. Looks like the study that mentions "resuspension" is a different study[1] than the one in the second link. [1]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231014007419?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13522...