This reply makes no sense; GCs don't have to worry about a stale stackframe causing stack-allocated data to go haywire, because they're not using stack allocati

This reply makes no sense; GCs don't have to worry about a stale stackframe causing stack-allocated data to go haywire, because they're not using stack allocation to begin with. > At some level they all rely on massive libraries written in C What? How does your "C++ product [that] does not use a single explicit allocation" actually manage memory?