4 ms·
NYT and WSJ are probably fine with that, as if you are going to spend money on a subscription, it is probably one of those. So why share any revenue with the s
by MattGaiser 5y ago
NYT and WSJ are probably fine with that, as if you are going to spend money on a subscription, it is probably one of those.
So why share any revenue with the smaller papers?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Wowfunhappy 5y agoIt's probably one of those major papers (I'd include a few others like The Washington Post) but which one? There is precedent for the major papers working together in markets where it makes sense to do so, see the International Herald Tribune.
- ghaff 5y agoThe Economist is another for a more international English-speaking audience. FT for European finance. Maybe a more cultural magazine like The New Yorker. But 2-3 is probably the limit for the vast number of people.
- TulliusCicero 5y agoIn a revenue sharing scheme, they would be able to command a larger share than the others. With enough people subscribed, it could possibly give them more revenue than the status quo.