4 ms·
Sure, but if there was such a thing as adblock for the physical world, able to get rid of freeway billboards, USA Today's "hybrid babies" front page (https://ww
by eugeniub 5y ago
Sure, but if there was such a thing as adblock for the physical world, able to get rid of freeway billboards, USA Today's "hybrid babies" front page (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/usatoday-hybrid-babies-ad-wrap/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/usatoday-hybrid-babies-ad-...), etc, it would be extremely popular.
- jfengel 5y agoMan, that feels like a big stunt for a good-but-not-great show. It's the kind of thing they only get to pull once, and I'd expect them to save that for something huge that would draw an enormous audience to subscribe (something on the level of Stranger Things or Game of Thrones). Sweet Tooth was nice, but clearly a bit slapped together. They keep the CGI to a minimum, but what's there is pretty cheaply done. The practical effects are nice, but simple in a way that feels like it was done quickly. It's neat that the show was in production before COVID, though I'd be curious to know how much of it was prescient. The acting is great and the writing pretty good. But it's not going to be a breakout hit. So I'm a bit surprised they'd promote it so hard to attract and audience that will surely say, "Hey, that was OK. Glad I'm already subscribed. But I'm not rushing out to tell my friends about it."