4 ms·
I wouldn't be so fast in claiming that the "Nationalist" faction was worse: - Bombing of Cabra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Cabra https://en.wikip
by ankalagon 5y ago
I wouldn't be so fast in claiming that the "Nationalist" faction was worse:
- Bombing of Cabra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Cabra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Cabra
- Sinking of SS Castillo de Olite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Castillo_de_Olite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Castillo_de_Olite
- Paracuellos Massacress: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracuellos_massacres https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracuellos_massacres
Edit: However, fighting because of what faction was worse in a conflict that ended more than 80 years ago is nonsense. This comment was made only to remind all that both factions made war crimes.
Franco supporters' oppression aginst the losers side ("Republicans" and Communists) was worse after the war, from what I know.
- otikik 5y agoOne of the factions can be worse without the other being perfect. All my grandparents were pro-Franco (some more openly than others). I have done my own research and I have concluded that no, they were the baddies. Of course the other side were not all angels. They never are. > ended more than 80 years ago The problem is that that conflict from 80 years ago had ramifications that continue to exist today, even present in our Constitution.
- ankalagon 5y agoI don't know, but for anarchists and for POUM [1], Franco could be part of "the baddies" (things are never so simple like good and bad), but "Republican" (with support for the URSS) members were the ones that killed them. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Days https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Days