3 ms·
The fertility rate of the state in question might be more relevant here which seems to be about 3.0 [0]. These conversations miss the fact that the actual dist
by durovo 5y ago
The fertility rate of the state in question might be more relevant here which seems to be about 3.0 [0].
These conversations miss the fact that the actual distribution of the people in the country is very relevant. If you have ever been to UP, you would know how it is overflowing with people.
0. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India_by_fertility_rate https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_union_ter...
- inglor_cz 5y agoHigh TFR + high density of population + not enough resources = a recipe for future disaster. Kudos to the Uttar Pradesh authorities for tackling the problem. Yes, Alaska or Estonia could live with a TFR of 3.0 for a while. Uttar Pradesh not so much. 200 million people crowded in a state smaller than Germany is already on the edge.