41 ms·

... That is why I predict that in the coming decades we will continue to be exposed to the dangers of pandemics and that in time something even more dangerous a

... That is why I predict that in the coming decades we will continue to be exposed to the dangers of pandemics and that in time something even more dangerous and devastating than the seventh coronavirus could hit us. Thus, even when science protects us from the threats from COVID-19, this is unlikely to mark the end of our fight against pandemics in the 21st century. It will only be the end of the beginning.

forcry 5y ago
> when science protects us I am not sure how much this "science" that seem to be afraid of data, be able to "protect" us. >https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#worker https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#worker >OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward. The VAERS system is another thing that seem to suggest that the "science" is really not interested in collecting the data. Completely unreliable voluntary reporting which no measures to ensure that every event is reported. A vaccine under EUA deployed world wide appear to be a huge opportunity to collect safety related data. But somehow this "scientific" community appear to be not interested in ensuring that it is of the required quality. The covid vaccines are not even in the list of Vaccines for the AEFI events are reportable by law. All in the name of "disincentivizing population" I am sure.. As a community, we should outright reject "science" that is not interested in collecting any and all relevant data.

forcry 5y ago

> when science protects us I am not sure how much this "science" that seem to be afraid of data, be able to "protect" us. >https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#worker https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#worker >OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward. The VAERS system is another thing that seem to suggest that the "science" is really not interested in collecting the data. Completely unreliable voluntary reporting which no measures to ensure that every event is reported. A vaccine under EUA deployed world wide appear to be a huge opportunity to collect safety related data. But somehow this "scientific" community appear to be not interested in ensuring that it is of the required quality. The covid vaccines are not even in the list of Vaccines for the AEFI events are reportable by law. All in the name of "disincentivizing population" I am sure.. As a community, we should outright reject "science" that is not interested in collecting any and all relevant data.