2 ms·
You're high. Employing someone who 10 years ago may have engaged in some, or known about dodgy journalistic tactics is hardly much to write home about. Of cou
by speckledjim 15y ago
You're high.
Employing someone who 10 years ago may have engaged in some, or known about dodgy journalistic tactics is hardly much to write home about.
Of course he had meetings with execs from NewsCorp. They own a bunch of newspapers! Blair and Brown did exactly the same.
It sounds like you'd like the government to fall. I don't think most people in the country would.
I think most people are thoroughly bored of this 'scandal' about a bit of corruption that happened 10 years ago. There's more important news out there. Like the collapse of the Euro.
- atomicdog 15y ago>Of course he had meetings with execs from NewsCorp. He had Christmas dinner with Rebecca Brooks, he had a secret meeting with Murdoch on a private yacht before the election. There are meetings and then there are meetings.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- someone_welsh 15y ago"I think most people are thoroughly bored of this 'scandal' about a bit of corruption that happened 10 years ago. There's more important news out there." Nope. It's more to do with the fact that it's a scandal exposing just how corrupt and cosy the british power elites are. "A bit of corruption 10 years ago" is somewhat akin to Al Capone going down on tax evasion