>“There is currently no evidence that Sars-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin . . . There is a substantial body of scientific evidence supporting a zoonotic [animal-

>“There is currently no evidence that Sars-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin . . . There is a substantial body of scientific evidence supporting a zoonotic [animal-to-human] origin for Sars-CoV-2,” they conclude. Feel like this false dichotomy of "it was either wet market or created as a chimera virus in the lab" is not persuasive to the many people who think it likely was a natural virus that got pushed into the world because it was being handed by humans in a lab.