3 ms·
They think they've figured out why some people clot now: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03744-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03744-4
by ck2 5y ago
They think they've figured out why some people clot now:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03744-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03744-4
But there's always going to be risks of complications and reaction.
What bothers me is instead of developing a test to determine who is at risk "science" and "policy makers" write it off as "well only a very very tiny percent of people will have a reaction/death so it's acceptable".
Well no, not really acceptable if you are that 1% (I happen to be one of the 1% with very bad reaction for months now, trust me you feel like someone has let down your entire life by not looking out for your situation and writing you off as expendable while hand-waiving it's all going to be okay).
There were reactions with the original SARS vaccines too, there is always a risk group but never a test developed to predict who is at risk:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
- Andys 5y agoI agree, the level of scientific curiosity over this is much lower than expected.
- detaro 5y agoPlenty places restricted or entirely stopped using the adeno-based vaccines because of the clots. The test you suggest would be useful, but is there a reason to assume there is an effective way of testing for risk? Once the main mechanism was found, tests to detect it happening/distinguish from other clots were developed to make it easier to treat. It's not like nothing happened about this.
- swiley 5y ago>But there's always going to be risks of complications and reaction. Which is why no one should be required to take it.