3 ms·
Is this not a sign that humans in a region are hitting the carrying capacity of the local environment?
by bitxbitxbitcoin 5y ago
Is this not a sign that humans in a region are hitting the carrying capacity of the local environment?
- MikeUt 5y agoThere are three factors at play: population size, population lifestyle, and efficiency of resource use. It is customary to completely ignore population size as a factor, as long as lifestyles or resource use could be more eco-friendly (commute with bicycles, rebuild infrastructure to make that possible, re-zone cities, change diets, make industries and farming greener, etc..) This is the case even though those large, society-wide transformations would take decades, and even while the population is actively being increased by immigration (most of the developed world has had below-replacement fertility for decades, so birthrates are not a factor).
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoHumans in those regions are far beyond the carrying capacity of the local environment, and have been for decades.
- edmundsauto 5y agoDoesn't the correlation between this statement and reality depend mostly on the definition of "local"?
- Arnt 5y agoYes, but at least in some people's opinion, it is currently true even for "local to the third planet". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day The point is arguable, IMO, and the details very much so.