28 ms·
So having tried it out the song sounds...exactly the same. So does this just make it that when it's played these detection systems can't pick it up since it's s
by MeinBlutIstBlau 5y ago
So having tried it out the song sounds...exactly the same. So does this just make it that when it's played these detection systems can't pick it up since it's somewhat different? Or if I make a commercial product, include this version of the song, I can somehow afford lawyers to defend myself when the music industry sues me for using what sounds like the same song, just with the 1's and 0's ordered a little differently?
Edit: was out of the loop on the joke...
- detaro 5y agoIt's a joke about GitHub Copilot.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- abetusk 5y agoI think that's the joke. It literally takes the exact same song unaltered but it says it's "using machine learning", "fair use" etc. to give the pretense of it being legitimate. This is most likely a commentary on GitHub co-pilot and how the authors of this joke think that GitHub co-pilot is violating copyright and does not fall under fair-use. I just confirmed the "processed" file has the same SHA256 sum as the original. EDIT: I incorrectly labelled at Google co-pilot instead of GitHub co-pilot. Fixed.
- barbecue_sauce 5y agoGithub Copilot.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- laurent92 5y agoThe code source is setTimeout(…, random()). I’d say, even if it takes long to build the neural network, it is very CPU efficient.