3 ms·
Honest question. Why do your examples assume that the autonomous machine has to be smaller than the human operated version?
by bandyaboot 5y ago
Honest question. Why do your examples assume that the autonomous machine has to be smaller than the human operated version?
- Robotbeat 5y agoWell there’s an argument that there’s not a lot gained by going fully autonomous for huge machines. These huge trucks are like $5 million apiece not including sensors and hardware and software for automation, and so hiring a human to operate them (or even just babysit them) for $20-30/hour (typical dump or coal truck operator wage) seems like a pretty obvious idea. Which doesn’t mean people aren’t automating mining trucks… they are! But there aren’t huge cost savings in terms of labor. I guess I’m just saying that scaling up your smaller machine to be larger has the same kind of productivity enhancements as switching your smaller machine to autonomous. It is also something humans have been doing ever since the development of domestic beasts of burden.