2 ms·
The Sistine Chapel is not a public place; they have the right to control what people do inside it (subject to the law, of course). Also, moral rights do not in
by otterley 5y ago
The Sistine Chapel is not a public place; they have the right to control what people do inside it (subject to the law, of course).
Also, moral rights do not include the right of a subject not to be photographed in public. Moral rights (to the extent they exist in Europe; they don't exist in the U.S.) are about rights the author of a work possesses that transcend economic rights, such as attribution and to be free of derogatory treatment.
- dynamite-ready 5y agoIn the case of a model/actor, where their image could be suggested to be a form of work, mightn't there be a conflict of interests? That photo would obviously not be as valuable, if the subject was of someone else. As for the Sistine Chapel thing, that does make sense.