>An EO is not going to change precedent or case law about what is considered a restraint of trade by the supreme court Based on the quote from the FTC, it does

>An EO is not going to change precedent or case law about what is considered a restraint of trade by the supreme court Based on the quote from the FTC, it doesn't need to. The Supreme Court said that something must be "unreasonable" to be a restraint of trade. Declaring something to be unreasonable is not modifying the criterion set forth by the courts one iota. If the door is open, drive a truck through it.