3 ms·
Maybe don't call Earthly "free and open source" when it clearly is neither -- it is licensed under the Business Source License.
by icy 5y ago
Maybe don't call Earthly "free and open source" when it clearly is neither -- it is licensed under the Business Source License.
- hitekker 5y agoI’m trouble finding the words “free and open source” or “foss” in their marketing material. Rather, it looks like they’re calling Earthly “open core” or “source available” according to https://earthly.dev/blog/every-open-core-company-should-be-a-source-available-company/ https://earthly.dev/blog/every-open-core-company-should-be-a...
- icy 5y agoLanding page, below the 'Get Earthly' buttons (they have a few): > Free and open
- InitialBP 5y agoto be fair "Free and open" is different than "Free and Open Source". Open source has a much stronger connotation than open and I could certainly see calling it open if the source is available for the core of the product.