3 ms·
Here's some options that fit in 4 pixels: https://i.imgur.com/LtQ6eb7.png https://i.imgur.com/LtQ6eb7.png Some of these can look like $ if they're really tiny,
by chmod775 5y ago
Here's some options that fit in 4 pixels: https://i.imgur.com/LtQ6eb7.png https://i.imgur.com/LtQ6eb7.png
Some of these can look like $ if they're really tiny, but generally you'll need a while to figure out what's they're supposed to mean if you don't know what you're looking for.
- airstrike 5y agoTop right is the winner for me
- montroser 5y agoNice. Third from the left on top is great -- pretty unambiguous, and consistent with the w's and m's.
- femto 5y agoor: # ### # ### # ### #
- Sharlin 5y agoThis. It’s what the C64 (and I guess many/most early home computers) did. No need to draw the whole vertical line if it doesn’t reasonably fit.
- Sharlin 5y ago…and now I realized that even the ubiquitous IBM VGA 8x16 font does this! Single-pixel-wide counters would just look really bad, and even more bad on CRT monitors.
- chrisseaton 5y ago> It's just not mathematically possible to draw a proper "$" 4 pixels wide > Here's some options that fit in 4 pixels So which is it?
- matheusmoreira 5y agoI assume that "proper $" means the middle line is fully drawn, forming the two closed spaces at the upper left and lower right.