The best summary from them looks to be: > Overall, compared to Bazel, Earthly sacrifices some correctness and reproducibility in favor of significantly better

The best summary from them looks to be: > Overall, compared to Bazel, Earthly sacrifices some correctness and reproducibility in favor of significantly better usability and composability with existing open-source technologies Exactly how much correctness is getting sacrificed is pretty important. A key insight of Bazel is that you can’t have speed at scale without correctness. Would be good to have Earthly described within the framework of “Build Systems a la Carte”.