3 ms·
In the US, the burden of proof in constructive dismissal cases lies with the employee. How are you going to prove that you were placed on a secretive PIP list w
by anonydsfsfs 5y ago
In the US, the burden of proof in constructive dismissal cases lies with the employee. How are you going to prove that you were placed on a secretive PIP list without your knowledge?
- ggm 5y agoThat's just so wrong. It suggests to me the 10% kill list can't be done in Europe or Australia for instance, unfair dismissal law would (I honestly believe) empower asking for the list in the court action. Given this list is known to exist the presumption of evidence is really strong and lying or hiding the list would be a serious offence.
- ggm 5y ago> That's just so wrong I want to be clear I mean I disagree with this policy which is self evidently true, not that I dispute what I replied to. Colloquial English can be misread so easily.