Agreed that syntax isn't perfect (and I'd be fine with `name: type` although the current `name type` doesn't chafe me much), but it's a lot more approachable to

Agreed that syntax isn't perfect (and I'd be fine with `name: type` although the current `name type` doesn't chafe me much), but it's a lot more approachable to a much wider audience (and IMO just easier to read for almost anyone regardless of background) than OCaml or Haskel or F#. > Let's hope we can have something like that in the next 10 years! Agreed. :)