5 ms·

mate, you're under NDA with the contract you're bound to, and they can easily claim everything you just disclosed violates the NDA as grounds to swap you out of

mate, you're under NDA with the contract you're bound to, and they can easily claim everything you just disclosed violates the NDA as grounds to swap you out of the contract. Now if that's what you want, godspeed. But you're perfectly identifiable to anyone managing insider threats at INTC; you're strongly advised to delete everything you posted under this account. You run the risk of impacting not just yourself but the contractor you work for, and depending on how crucial this business is to the contractor, the outcome could be a years-long pain in the neck.

naveen99 5y ago
While you are clearly concerned, it’s very unlikely. If the bureaucracy there was really that good at catching stuff like this, they wouldn’t be so incompetent at allowing this whole situation in the first place. also I doubt anyone really cares enough. It’s not like intel is a family business or even a closely held company with someone taking anything personally.
- intelinsider 5y ago
  Also, while it is true that I did sign an NDA, it listed very specific things that I'm not allowed to disclose, and internal policies and procedures were not on the list.
- morpheos137 5y ago
  Well if the bureaucracy catches him then I guess it is not that incompetent after all. Anyway if I was a business leader there is no way that I would want to renew this kind of contractor. His job is to do contract engineering not complain about what he thinks are organisational failures in a public forum. This kind of complainer is typically entitled and does not have a good work ethic or work output. If he thinks Intel is such a bad organisation then he should seek work elsewhere. These are the same kind of people who want to "work" full time from home for 4 hours a day.
  - naveen99 5y ago
    You get what you pay for. Working long hours is orthogonal to working effectively. Modern capitalists don’t resort to moralizing work style like that.

naveen99 5y ago

While you are clearly concerned, it’s very unlikely. If the bureaucracy there was really that good at catching stuff like this, they wouldn’t be so incompetent at allowing this whole situation in the first place. also I doubt anyone really cares enough. It’s not like intel is a family business or even a closely held company with someone taking anything personally.

intelinsider 5y ago
Also, while it is true that I did sign an NDA, it listed very specific things that I'm not allowed to disclose, and internal policies and procedures were not on the list.
morpheos137 5y ago
Well if the bureaucracy catches him then I guess it is not that incompetent after all. Anyway if I was a business leader there is no way that I would want to renew this kind of contractor. His job is to do contract engineering not complain about what he thinks are organisational failures in a public forum. This kind of complainer is typically entitled and does not have a good work ethic or work output. If he thinks Intel is such a bad organisation then he should seek work elsewhere. These are the same kind of people who want to "work" full time from home for 4 hours a day.
- naveen99 5y ago
  You get what you pay for. Working long hours is orthogonal to working effectively. Modern capitalists don’t resort to moralizing work style like that.