4 ms·
Sure, if they were only targeting poor performing folks then your statement has merit. The difference is at amazon managers have a 5-10% URA (Unregretted Attrit
by malfist 5y ago
Sure, if they were only targeting poor performing folks then your statement has merit. The difference is at amazon managers have a 5-10% URA (Unregretted Attrition Rate) and must let go that percentage of their team each and every year.
Doesn't take long to chew through poor performers and have to move on to people lower on the political totem pole, or worse at playing the political game/being friendly.
- rdtwo 5y agoThe bigger problem is that it discourages formation of high performance teams. The high performers know to stay away from established high performance teams because they risk getting cut