I've seen this pattern before: problems encountered with a new or different technology are attributed to that technology, while comparable problems with the exi

I've seen this pattern before: problems encountered with a new or different technology are attributed to that technology, while comparable problems with the existing system are seen as the fault of specific teams/developers or just as the sort of natural bugs you get in software development. The same kind of problem that's seen as a clear reason to avoid the less popular tool is seen as just something to solve or workaround in the more popular case. That's how politics generally works: there always has to be a plausible "objective" reason for something, it just doesn't have to be applied uniformly or even actually true.