3 ms·
It is easier for me to believe that you haven't looked at the patent description at all than it is to believe that you actually think HTML or text adventures ar
by GHFigs 15y ago
It is easier for me to believe that you haven't looked at the patent description at all than it is to believe that you actually think HTML or text adventures are prior art for it.
- zoips 15y agoA wiki seems to be a pretty good example. A wiki processor parses data (text) looking for "structures in the data" (camel-cased words), which it then converts to a UI element (hyperlink) that a user can take action on (click it to cause the browser to transition to a new page). At first glance to me it appears wikis violate this patent, so if you can show a wiki as prior art, the patent can't hold.