> Except the patent doesn't. Why do you comment on something that you don't know about, and have not bothered to check? Why do you comment on a comment you hav

> Except the patent doesn't. Why do you comment on something that you don't know about, and have not bothered to check? Why do you comment on a comment you haven't bothered to read properly? Your attitude stinks. For one, I said 'if' - I simply don't have time to give a patent the full reading it deserves to make an firm assertion, unlike most people in every patent-related post who read the abstract and make BS claims about it. In addition, I mentioned a previous examples which makes you wonder (1) why this should be an issue now and not a decade ago e.g. with HTC's previous phones (2) how patentable such a thing should be. I would not be surprised if this kind of thing appeared in the Psion PDAs, either - but it has been a very long time since I used one.