> It's bad for the environment Not any more so than other forms of energy consumption. If anything, Bitcoin incentivizes the use of clean renewable energy. htt

> It's bad for the environment Not any more so than other forms of energy consumption. If anything, Bitcoin incentivizes the use of clean renewable energy. https://niccarter.info/topics/ https://niccarter.info/topics/ > bad for crime Hard to even parse what that means given how much crime is committed via dollars. https://unchained-capital.com/blog/bitcoin-is-not-for-criminals/ https://unchained-capital.com/blog/bitcoin-is-not-for-crimin... > bad for laymen Meaningless drivel. > undemocratic (vote with money) Bitcoin is both undemocratic AND is not a "vote with money" type of system. Governance is unrelated to who holds it. https://www.lopp.net/bitcoin-information/governance.html https://www.lopp.net/bitcoin-information/governance.html > no knobs to adjust monetary/fiscal policy That's a feature. > it poses as an alternative to government institutions that serve society with things like roads and health care. Also a feature. https://www.coincenter.org/a-human-rights-activists-response-to-bitcoin-critics/ https://www.coincenter.org/a-human-rights-activists-response...