4 ms·
In turnitin’s defence, in my recollection their training material explicitly and repeatedly tells you not to do this - that a positive turnitin result is not th
by 542458 5y ago
In turnitin’s defence, in my recollection their training material explicitly and repeatedly tells you not to do this - that a positive turnitin result is not the same as plagiarism, and that all positives should be manually reviewed. The student-facing side of it can be bad, as it errs on the side of extreme caution.
When I (as a TA) had to mark dozens and dozens of papers pre-screening for obviously copied paragraphs was a very nice time saver. Otherwise the only students I would catch are the ones with poor English skills (grammar switching from flawless to flawed and back again is a pretty good tell that the paragraph was written by somebody else).
- tyingq 5y agoI do agree that instructors hold a fair amount of responsibility for using the tool right. But the tool is shite. It misses some very basic stuff. Like "stuff in quotes followed by a footnote/citation" is copied, by definition, on purpose. It also notes things like missing commas as if it's 100% authoritative. Even though the passage in question passed Grammarly, Word, etc. There's no notion of nuance or suggestion, just "right/wrong".