4 ms·
1. The software should’ve never existed, it’s a testimony to the failure of our education system. 2. You are far luckier than most when it comes to your circum
by reayn 5y ago
1. The software should’ve never existed, it’s a testimony to the failure of our education system.
2. You are far luckier than most when it comes to your circumstances, i have seen myself people failing exams for similar mishaps to yours.
- alanfranz 5y ago1. Explain why. 2. Shitty instructors are not the software’s fault.
- reayn 5y ago1. Re-stating what half the comments on this thread are already saying would be a waste of my time. 2. This has nothing to do with instructors (in my experience instructors have little to no say or participation in the usage of these systems), badly written algorithms will frequently kick students out of tests for non-adverse behavior or failure in facial recognition (once again oft-mentioned in this thread).
- alanfranz 5y ago1. I can’t read your mind. I assume you’re unwilling or unable to discuss the issue further. 2. Some issues, as I said, are specific to certain implementations and don’t invalidate eproctoring as a whole.