4 ms·
Yeah, I remember when the first CMOS sensors with phase detection elements started showing up. This is what I meant by "conceptually similar" although I probabl
by ohazi 5y ago
Yeah, I remember when the first CMOS sensors with phase detection elements started showing up. This is what I meant by "conceptually similar" although I probably should have clarified, since we've had massive sensors without these elements for longer.
I guess contrast-based autofocus is what really needs the DSP, since you need to do edge detection / FFTs on more patches of image for the technique to work well, as well as PSF analysis if you want to guess the lens defocus direction. With phase it's just a few cheap 1D correlations, and you get accurate lens direction information for free, which explains why it feels so much faster.
Unfortunately we didn't have access to an electron microscope, so a modern mirrorless camera would have made for a rather less interesting teardown.
- sudosysgen 5y agoContrast based autofocus just doesn't compete either. New, higher end mirrorless cameras still use phase detection just like the DSLRs of old. Sony still uses old-style sensors but mounted directly on the chip, while Canon uses pixels that only accept light from some directions to calculate phase information. Both of these tactics end up with very similar results. Though it is augmented with DSP.