3 ms·
I agree... a friend turned me onto EXT, and it's quite impressive but hardly gets the same attention and coverage as some of the other frameworks simply due to
by pxlpshr 18y ago
I agree... a friend turned me onto EXT, and it's quite impressive but hardly gets the same attention and coverage as some of the other frameworks simply due to its cost (which is extremely high! tears).
http://extjs.com/products/extjs/ http://extjs.com/products/extjs/
http://extjs.com/deploy/dev/examples/desktop/desktop.html http://extjs.com/deploy/dev/examples/desktop/desktop.html
- nickb 18y agoYou might wanna read this: http://pablotron.org/?cid=1556 http://pablotron.org/?cid=1556 and this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9878693-16.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9878693-16.html
- andreyf 18y agoNo, it's not completely Open Source, but it is if you pay up, or if you're not making money off it. What's all the confusion? I think it's a clever move ... the result is more economically feasible than "real" open source, and a lot more libre than secret source.
- michaelneale 18y agoyeah its a crying shame, cause it is very impressive. More for "classic" type of productivity apps though. I thought the cost we per developer and pretty reasonable? for commercial licencing?
- stcredzero 18y agoHigh cost per developer? That was the mistake many of the Smalltalk companies made. Mindshare and volume will always win in the end.