4 ms·
> In conclusion, BobbyJo deserved it and it was a right thing to do. Disrespectful? Yes, that's the point. This is absolutely against HN guidelines, general co
by fouric 5y ago
> In conclusion, BobbyJo deserved it and it was a right thing to do. Disrespectful? Yes, that's the point.
This is absolutely against HN guidelines, general common decency, and just pure logic. You do not get to decide who "deserves it" and who doesn't.
Even in cases where the information is easily found, there are polite ways to say that, and you appear to have intentionally chosen an impolite manner.
- EliRivers 5y agoyou appear to have intentionally chosen an impolite manner. Yes, EXACTLY so. Choosing to be polite or not is part of expression. Active choice of politeness (or not) adds layers to meaning and communication. In this case, part of choosing to be impolite is expressing that BobbyJo didn't deserve politeness here. Conversely, sometimes being polite is itself brutally insulting. In this case, it would have been passive-aggressively treating BobbyJo like a child; far more insulting. You do not get to decide who "deserves it" and who doesn't. Of course I can make that decision. Just did. You might subscribe to a set of rules in which I don't get to make that decision; I clearly do not subscribe to that. I note that I certainly won't be telling you who you should and should not be polite to, though.
- BobbyJo 5y agoHNs rules aren't tailored toward maximizing expression. They are tailored toward maximizing discussion and information exchange. Impoliteness, while certainly a form of expression, is detrimental to discussion, hence it being frowned upon here. If your goal is simply self expression for its own sake, visual arts likely would provide a better medium than internet discussion boards.