6 ms·

Just solve the aging problem first. That seems to be pretty close at hand anyhow.

by nynx 5y ago

AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y ago
It seems to me the most likely scenario is that we perfect the ability to copy minds into an electronic computer system. Such a digital mind would no longer need most of the resources a human body would and could potentially last nigh-indefinitely. It would also be able to take advantage of both >1G (no flabby meat body) and <1G (no aging) constant accelerations. Further, a colonization effort by digital beings would only require raw resources to build more electronics and starlight for power, which expands the number of habitable places from "planets with human survivable conditions" to "basically anywhere near a star".
- arcanon 5y ago
  It seems trivializing and like an existential crisis to have all of a humans being encoded in a computer. Once you have that, why even keep it running for all time as it is? Its just a version of software you could make changes to. We are probably not as glorious as we could be to become immortal as we are.
- kybernetikos 5y ago
  Are there any software, hardware or cloud providers currently existing that you would trust to run your consciousness?
- robotresearcher 5y ago
  Why does this seem ‘most likely’ to you? I don’t see current tech that points this way at all. We don’t even have broad agreement on what a mind is beyond the the everyday folk notion. What are we to copy?
mcculley 5y ago
I am not convinced there is any solution to aging. When I was a child, I read headlines that claimed a solution was close at hand. We seem only marginally closer to eliminating aging. Importantly, how many memories do you think can fit into a human brain? If a 1,000 year old man cannot remember all of his life, has aging been solved?
- Johnny555 5y ago
  Does one need to remember all of their life to be happy? Maybe the details just get spottier with bigger gaps, but you still remember the big events and when you need more details your Google neural implant tells you more. I'm far from 1,000 but I can't remember every detail of my life, but I don't think it interferes with my quality of life.
  - mcculley 5y ago
    No, one does not need a perfect memory to be happy. But I’m not convinced that somehow expanding brain sizes to accommodate immortality means we have solved aging for humans.

Just solve the aging problem first. That seems to be pretty close at hand anyhow.

by nynx 5y ago

Just solve the aging problem first. That seems to be pretty close at hand anyhow.

It seems to me the most likely scenario is that we perfect the ability to copy minds into an electronic computer system. Such a digital mind would no longer need most of the resources a human body would and could potentially last nigh-indefinitely. It would also be able to take advantage of both >1G (no flabby meat body) and <1G (no aging) constant accelerations. Further, a colonization effort by digital beings would only require raw resources to build more electronics and starlight for power, which expands the number of habitable places from "planets with human survivable conditions" to "basically anywhere near a star".

arcanon 5y ago
It seems trivializing and like an existential crisis to have all of a humans being encoded in a computer. Once you have that, why even keep it running for all time as it is? Its just a version of software you could make changes to. We are probably not as glorious as we could be to become immortal as we are.
kybernetikos 5y ago
Are there any software, hardware or cloud providers currently existing that you would trust to run your consciousness?
robotresearcher 5y ago
Why does this seem ‘most likely’ to you? I don’t see current tech that points this way at all. We don’t even have broad agreement on what a mind is beyond the the everyday folk notion. What are we to copy?

mcculley 5y ago

I am not convinced there is any solution to aging. When I was a child, I read headlines that claimed a solution was close at hand. We seem only marginally closer to eliminating aging. Importantly, how many memories do you think can fit into a human brain? If a 1,000 year old man cannot remember all of his life, has aging been solved?

Johnny555 5y ago
Does one need to remember all of their life to be happy? Maybe the details just get spottier with bigger gaps, but you still remember the big events and when you need more details your Google neural implant tells you more. I'm far from 1,000 but I can't remember every detail of my life, but I don't think it interferes with my quality of life.
- mcculley 5y ago
  No, one does not need a perfect memory to be happy. But I’m not convinced that somehow expanding brain sizes to accommodate immortality means we have solved aging for humans.