4 ms·

> electromagnetic field scientists > modulation of wireless devices > makes the energy more biologically active > our cellular mechanisms > natural cellular

> electromagnetic field scientists > modulation of wireless devices > makes the energy more biologically active > our cellular mechanisms > natural cellular processes > stress proteins and free radicals Define any of the above, and point to a reputable source when any of the above phrases are used. It's a collection of phrases which are all "off", like a foreign person with broken english.

wizzwizz4 5y ago
• No clue. • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation • No clue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_activity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_activity doesn't apply. (This is a crank warning sign.) • This is too generic to answer out of context. • Same as the above, perhaps with the naturalistic fallacy thrown in (also a crank warning sign). • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_hormone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_hormone and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-radical_theory_of_aging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-radical_theory_of_aging Of your six quotes, only two (maybe three) of them are crank warning signs, and two have clear, well-defined meanings.
- coldpie 5y ago
  Two crank warning signs is a massive number for someone purporting to be a scientist or expert...
  - wizzwizz4 5y ago
    And there were a few others not quoted. But just because a crank is saying something, that doesn't mean it's wrong; this person seems inclined to complain about phones causing cancer independently of whether it's true, so his view shouldn't really affect what you think either way. I doubt he's right, but I'm not confident enough to laugh at him. Even relatively low-intensity radio waves affect neurons, so it's not like they have no effect on the body.
- dariusj18 5y ago
  RE: #2 It's not about any single word, it's about the use of words together. ex. "modulation of wireless devices" is not just modulation, what does the phrase as a whole mean and what is it's actual relevance to the matter at hand? In this specific case why would they not cite references for that claim?
- gus_massa 5y ago
  #6 Free radicals: It's very difficult to create free radicals with photons that has less energy than UV rays. And the photons of cell phones has a few order of magnitude less energy. The term is well defined, but it's almost impossible that it's relevant. Stress hormone: Your link is about hormones produced by glands, and in the sentence it looks like some modification of each cell. Again, the term is well defined, but I'm not sure they are talking about the same thing, and it's not very probable that it's relevant.

wizzwizz4 5y ago

• No clue. • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation • No clue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_activity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_activity doesn't apply. (This is a crank warning sign.) • This is too generic to answer out of context. • Same as the above, perhaps with the naturalistic fallacy thrown in (also a crank warning sign). • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_hormone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_hormone and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-radical_theory_of_aging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-radical_theory_of_aging Of your six quotes, only two (maybe three) of them are crank warning signs, and two have clear, well-defined meanings.

coldpie 5y ago
Two crank warning signs is a massive number for someone purporting to be a scientist or expert...
- wizzwizz4 5y ago
  And there were a few others not quoted. But just because a crank is saying something, that doesn't mean it's wrong; this person seems inclined to complain about phones causing cancer independently of whether it's true, so his view shouldn't really affect what you think either way. I doubt he's right, but I'm not confident enough to laugh at him. Even relatively low-intensity radio waves affect neurons, so it's not like they have no effect on the body.
dariusj18 5y ago
RE: #2 It's not about any single word, it's about the use of words together. ex. "modulation of wireless devices" is not just modulation, what does the phrase as a whole mean and what is it's actual relevance to the matter at hand? In this specific case why would they not cite references for that claim?
gus_massa 5y ago
#6 Free radicals: It's very difficult to create free radicals with photons that has less energy than UV rays. And the photons of cell phones has a few order of magnitude less energy. The term is well defined, but it's almost impossible that it's relevant. Stress hormone: Your link is about hormones produced by glands, and in the sentence it looks like some modification of each cell. Again, the term is well defined, but I'm not sure they are talking about the same thing, and it's not very probable that it's relevant.