> It's not a violation of copyright to train a model. Many people on HN assert this based on the Authors Guild vs. Google case, but it's quite important to kee

> It's not a violation of copyright to train a model. Many people on HN assert this based on the Authors Guild vs. Google case, but it's quite important to keep in mind that that case was about Google creating a search algorithm, which is not generating "new" output. We are talking about a very different kind of system here and in many other cases. Claiming the Authors Guild case sets precedent for these very different systems seems unbased to me.