2 ms·
Yes, exactly, this is exactly what I said. Replace the internals but keep it the same externally. Quite frankly I'm sick of these bad faith arguments where some
by lloydatkinson 5y ago
Yes, exactly, this is exactly what I said. Replace the internals but keep it the same externally. Quite frankly I'm sick of these bad faith arguments where someone puts words in my mouth and then creates a strawman and argues against that.
Thank you for actually understanding and explaining what I meant. It's a nice change.
- apostacy 5y agoSorry, I didn't mean to mischaracterize what you said. It sounded like you were saying you wanted to change the interface somewhat. The reason that I thought that was because if it was a 100% transparent interface identical to an existing fax experience, then there are already solutions like that, but we just don't notice them because they are so transparent. Regular consumers sending faxes over copper already have their fax calls digitized, encrypted, and compressed. And offices have pretty simple solutions to manage fax numbers from their servers. I think Exchange server might be able to do it out of the box now. The reason I compared it to the "dropbox" comment was that I think that it would be a case of needless over-optimization.