> There is exactly one such comment from my side So you admit you were arguing in bad faith? > Point one one single argument that you have made to me, that I

> There is exactly one such comment from my side So you admit you were arguing in bad faith? > Point one one single argument that you have made to me, that I did not respond to head-on. Just one. I'll wait. > point out a single example of me engaing in bad-faith argumentation with you. A single actual example. And then. Sure, how about this very comment? > Ah, yes. Like the argument that "Tether is being investigated for fraud" thus "every stablecoin is essentially fraud". Seems like a water-tight argument you have there. You're misrepresenting my statement in a way to obfuscate the very real fraud accusations against Tether and other stable-coins. I never said all stablecoins are fradulent. Why are you focused on that falsified version of my argument rather than arguing against the fact that Tether is indeed fraudulent? > maybe, we can continue the conversation Not interested in continuing it, thank you!