3 ms·
> so pure soul might be a bit of a stretch. This is exactly where you imply it.
by s_dev 5y ago
> so pure soul might be a bit of a stretch.
This is exactly where you imply it.
- jsiepkes 5y agoSo from just that you can extract my words must mean he "either knowingly damaging the environment, scamming vulnerable people or wasting energy"? But I do think you need to be spotless for the term "pure of soul". And no, I don't think he is "either knowingly damaging the environment, scamming vulnerable people or wasting energy". But I also don't think he has a spotless record either. I don't like this "everything is either black or white" trend.