4 ms·
Croatia did a full proper own goal, most likely due to nervousness and maybe a bit of orientation loss. All the others have been mere redirected shots from opp
by yawaworht1978 5y ago
Croatia did a full proper own goal, most likely due to nervousness and maybe a bit of orientation loss.
All the others have been mere redirected shots from opponents, some of which would have landed or not, thus, so to say "forced auto goals".
Other issue is why was the penalty given to England last night, they had video review and I am still wondering how that could qualify as a malicious foul. I suppose it's the same rule with hands on ball, intentional or not doesn't seem to matter.
- Silhouette 5y agoOther issue is why was the penalty given to England last night, they had video review and I am still wondering how that could qualify as a malicious foul. I suppose it's the same rule with hands on ball, intentional or not doesn't seem to matter. A penalty doesn't require malice, only an offence inside the penalty area that would otherwise qualify for a direct free kick. If the ref had thought it was malicious, he would have been reaching for his card pocket as well. Once the ref has made a subjective decision, VAR will only change the outcome if there has been a clear and obvious error by the referee.