>have to prove themselves superior to classical ones, at least on designed tasks. i think calling them "designed tasks" is laundering what's going on. call a s

>have to prove themselves superior to classical ones, at least on designed tasks. i think calling them "designed tasks" is laundering what's going on. call a spade a spade - it's simulating completely random circuits. so what's the point? >but I'm optimistic they will in about a decade. you and every other researcher/vc/funding agency.