From court order, via http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=2160 http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=2160 > Order the defendant to withdraw t

From court order, via http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=2160 http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=2160 > Order the defendant to withdraw the articles (...) from all their sites (Google News and "cache" Google or any other name (...) The other articles linked from http://slashdot.org/story/06/09/18/115203/Google-News-Removes-Belgian-Newspaper http://slashdot.org/story/06/09/18/115203/Google-News-Remove... are down now, but I believe the original lawsuit was in that very spirit: remove their articles from all Google's websites. Not just from Google News. Logical argumentation aside, Google's in no position to second-guess a court order ;-) Why did Associated Press put such a negative spin to the story? We can only guess...