That is a whole 'nother ball of wax. Consider someone wanting an AI. What exactly do they want? Well, is it a mind? Because we have seven billion of those a

That is a whole 'nother ball of wax. Consider someone wanting an AI. What exactly do they want? Well, is it a mind? Because we have seven billion of those and we can make more on demand. Takes a bit but they're pretty flexible. Once you start asking questions about what kind of mind you would like, aside from the pathological types who want a trapped and helpless mind to torture (and don't think that there won't be people who would get their jollies that way), most people seem to have a kind of subconscious archetype of an old-fashioned butler (I assure you I did not pick the profession based on irony). Your butler -- knows your business but rarely contradicts, perhaps corrects. Slides into the background when not needed, simply ... minding things. Perhaps not watched over by machines of loving grace, as Brautigan would have it, but tended to, looked out for. Without needs or drives or goals of their own to interfere with our individual or collective desires. Yes, the idea of AI does seem to converge on a fantastically intelligent p-zed in a nice suit, a less bloodthirsty form of some of the minds encountered in Watts' Blindsight, unencumbered by interior experience, desires and attachment, or what arises from thwarted desire and attachment, suffering.