4 ms·
> If the image being optimized for UX resulted in the wacky scoring situation that lowered their ranking in search, would that also not be considered a bad UX i
by vanderZwan 5y ago
> If the image being optimized for UX resulted in the wacky scoring situation that lowered their ranking in search, would that also not be considered a bad UX if it's harder for users to find you?
If you insist, but even then that is fixing the symptom instead of the cause.
- dylan604 5y agoDon't hate the player, hate the game? These people obviously tried to keep their UI/UX in mind by originally using the optimized image. That wound up screwing them in a way not normally thought about in UX optimizations. They published their findings so that others that don't normally think in this manner can be aware of their findings. They are the player. The game is the bullshit G does, and all of the other vendors that latch onto the bullshit G does that provide hoops for devs to jump through. That's the game. Who's really needing the ire of internet readers?
- vanderZwan 5y agoIt's not that I'm disagreeing with you, it's that I can not agree with you because we're not even arguing about the same thing here. I don't know what else I can say to clarify that.